In the internet world of clickbait headlines and fantastic
articles, it is not rare to see a title advertising “The Truth About Jesus” or “What
Would Jesus Really Do?” or something
along those lines. While the style of
these articles is a new take, the idea of revealing the ‘True’ Jesus has been
around for quite a while. Each new
document or artifact found that relates to Jesus or the New Testament is
eagerly awaited by the popular community, temped by the possibility of newly
revealed ‘Truth’.
This desire
for the truth is not a new phenomenon. It has not always been, however, based upon
new discovery. As far back as the second
century, there were those seeking to protect the truth (407). In this case, Irenaeus
did this by denouncing the New Testament Apocrypha as “spurious writings”
intended to deceive the less knowledgeable (407). Later, he would be refuted by those who
believed that the apocrypha held more truth than the rigidly defined canon. This
debate, still, to a degree, in motion today, has been argued from both sides countless
times. While the debate is not exactly
over, it has shifted somewhat from a focus on preserving the dictated canon to
a curiosity for unknown texts.
Today, with
more focus on newly discovered, previously unknown texts, there is a
fascination with revealing secret information that will unveil truth. This shift from seeking to preserve truth to pursuing
new discoveries is an interesting one, something that appears to reveal a
dissatisfaction with the set canon.
While both extremes have their values, it seems that both preservation
and discovery are equally important, and can both reveal information, Truth or
not, that is valuable to history and scholarship.
No comments:
Post a Comment